RUSSIAN THESAURUS
The ideographic dictionary (the thesaurus, the thematic dictionary, the regular dictionary of concepts) is the dictionary of regular type, i.e. in it{him} the material is located not in alphabetic, and in the regular order, concepts are grouped on sense, and the grouping of clauses{articles} is made from below upwards, forming hierarchical structure. Dictionaries of such type are known from an antiquity. All concepts are connected in a uniform network, to display which the given dictionary is called. Value of definitions and the thesaurus in philosophy is not understood yet in a due measure. On construction the given dictionary most of all resembles dictionary Roget P.M. " Thesaurus of English Words and phrases " (1862), containing 1000 clauses{articles} at 4 levels. In the given dictionary about 100000 lexemes incorporated in 7800 clauses{articles} (this, the cores and связок), grouped on 8 levels. On top level the widest settle down on volume of concept: the REALITY, the NATURE, ORGANIZATION, the PERSON, the SOCIETY. On the basis of this dictionary the thesaurus of any other language, including English can be constructed. Construction of the thesaurus leans{bases} on definitions of concepts. The dictionary working with definitions, is the conceptual dictionary, as terminological branch and encyclopaedic dictionaries (for example, "natural language"). It is higher step in comparison with explanatory dictionaries. Distinction between concept and a word cleanly formal. For example, the concept of Russian "agriculture" of many other things languages is designated in a word - "agriculture". Definitions are done{made} with the obvious instruction{indication} of patrimonial and specific concept (patrimonial and specific this). For example, " understanding - knowledge of sense ", and both "knowledge" and "sense" also are clauses{articles} and have definitions. Or " the sense - internal causality ", " концепт - sense of concept ", " a definition - the formulation концепта ", etc., etc. Such definition - from patrimonial and specific concepts (supplied by a sheaf or связками), is idle time, an initial form of definition to which it is necessary to aspire. From this model as from an oven, it is possible to dance by search of definition. Definitions usually do not accept such form simply because we to it{her} and do not aspire. That is, definitions are similar to functions of one argument. Behind verbosity of definition its{his} imperfection usually disappears. Discrepancy in the task of a sort or a kind is shown in incongruity of the scheme{plan} of classification or in the scheme{plan} of ideography accordingly. All set of clauses{articles} form a certain integrity, a network as their definitions are under construction only of elements of this set. And back - names of clauses{articles} should be used and some of them empty - reference are used in other definitions, therefore. This requirement concerns and to definitions of the concepts which are being inside of clause{article}. At such approach superfluous elements are excluded from definition and greater{big} clearness and definitions and all language picture as a whole is reached{achieved}. Definitions supply names of clauses{articles}. These nested concepts are central concepts of all network of concepts (basic concepts), are used for formation{education} other concepts. As clauses{articles} выделются concepts, either having filling, or used in definitions. One of applicabilities of this dictionary - a finding of these central concepts. In aggregate nested words make a basic word stock and can be used as range at studying Russian, for example at classification of concepts. There are certain subtleties at drawing up of the ideographic dictionary, even at presence of definition. One declaration on similarity on sense a little. On analogies to adjectives, specific concepts happen relative (in the majority) and quantitative. Depending on it{this} on a miscellaneous positioning concept of the dictionary is made. In the first case classification on specific difference, specific to an attribute is used. For example, clause{article} " medical (kind) the tool (sort) " is located not with a number{line} with clause{article} "tool", and in group MEDICINE. That definition could be used for positioning concept, the specific attribute should be only one. By the way, this idea is already used in systematization for a designation of kinds of organisms (the binary nomenclature) after K.Bauginym (1620) and K.Linneem (1753). The specific specific attribute in biology refers to синапоморфией (Хенниг, 1966). Though at present these{it} синапоморфии make absolute minority. Thus, definitions are an obligatory part of the dictionary, differently it is impossible a grouping of clauses{articles} to any formal attribute. In case of quantitative definitions (them about 6 %), positioning is made to a patrimonial attribute, as in dictionaries of synonyms. For example, for concept " greater{big} construction " is "construction". Thus in lines of definition the ledge and an italic triangle is done{made} to note difference from the first type of positioning. Presence of definitions with the obvious instruction{indication} of a sort allows to make CLASSIFICATION of CONCEPTS (in parts speeches) - 2-nd variant of a semantic grouping of concepts. At nouns on top level 7 categories (универсалий) - OBJECT, FORMATION{EDUCATION} (FORMATION), the PART, the CHARACTERISTIC, COMMUNICATION{CONNECTION}, CHANGE, ACTION, at verbs - 5, at adjectives - 8 settle down. This classification is a necessary stage for allocation of categories, and also happens, for example, is useful by search of suitable patrimonial concept. For the first time classification more than 5000 basic concepts is given.GROUPS | SUBGROUPS | DEPARTMENTS | SECTIONS | ||||
1 | WORLD ORDER | 1 | THE REALITY | 1 | THE REALITY | 1 | 5 |
2 | CONDITIONNALITY | 6 | 10 | ||||
3 | THE GENERALITY | 11 | 14 | ||||
2 | THE CONNECTION | 4 | THE CONNECTION | 15 | 17 | ||
5 | RELATION | 18 | 22 | ||||
2 | THE FORMATION | 3 | THE FORMATION | 6 | THE FORMATION | 23 | 26 |
7 | COMPATIBILITY | 27 | 31 | ||||
4 | PARTIALITY | 8 | PARTIALITY | 32 | 37 | ||
9 | COMPONENT | 38 | 42 | ||||
3 | RELATIONSHIP | 5 | VALUE | 10 | VALUE | 43 | 45 |
11 | QUANTITATIVE RELATION | 46 | 54 | ||||
12 | THE QUANTITATIVE DEPENDENCE | 55 | 58 | ||||
6 | FORM | 13 | ARRANGEMENT | 59 | 64 | ||
14 | SEQUENCE | 65 | 69 | ||||
15 | SPACE | 70 | 76 | ||||
4 | NATURE | 7 | THE PHENOMENON | 16 | THE PHENOMENON | 77 | 82 |
17 | THE DEVELOPMENT | 83 | 90 | ||||
18 | TIME | 91 | 94 | ||||
8 | MATTER | 19 | MATTER | 95 | 98 | ||
20 | THE MECHANICS | 99 | 100 | ||||
9 | SUBSTANCE | 21 | THERMODYNAMICS | 101 | 105 | ||
22 | STRUCTURE OF SUBSTANCE | 106 | 108 | ||||
23 | SUBSTANCE SOLIDE | 109 | 112 | ||||
5 | BEING | 10 | Material object | 24 | Material object | 113 | 115 |
25 | BODY (MATERIAL) | 116 | 122 | ||||
26 | ARRANGEMENT | 123 | 128 | ||||
11 | UNIVERSE | 27 | GRAVITY | 129 | 133 | ||
28 | PLANET | 134 | 139 | ||||
6 | ORGANIZATION | 12 | THE FUNCTIONING | 29 | THE FUNCTIONING | 140 | 147 |
30 | CORRECTNESS | 148 | 151 | ||||
31 | IRREGULARITY | 152 | 154 | ||||
13 | INFORMATION | 32 | INFORMATION | 155 | 157 | ||
33 | THE LACK OF CLARITY | 158 | 160 | ||||
7 | ALIVE NATURE | 14 | ALIVE NATURE | 34 | ALIVE NATURE | 161 | 166 |
35 | PLANTS | 167 | 171 | ||||
15 | ANIMALS | 36 | ANIMALS | 172 | 179 | ||
37 | NERVOUS SYSTEM | 180 | 181 | ||||
38 | PERCEPTION | 182 | 188 | ||||
8 | MAN | 16 | HUMAN ORGANISM | 39 | HUMAN ORGANISM | 189 | 193 |
40 | SANTE | 194 | 198 | ||||
17 | PSYCHICS | 41 | PSYCHICS | 199 | 200 | ||
42 | PENSEE | 201 | 204 | ||||
18 | EMOTIONS | 43 | EMOTIONS | 205 | 208 | ||
44 | ESTHETIQUE | 209 | 210 | ||||
9 | PERSONALITY | 19 | THE INTELLECTUAL SPHERE | 45 | THE PSYCHE OF PERSONALITY | 211 | 216 |
46 | IDEA | 217 | 221 | ||||
47 | KNOWLEDGE | 222 | 224 | ||||
20 | HUMAN LIFE | 48 | HUMAN LIFE | 225 | 229 | ||
49 | TROUBLE | 230 | 233 | ||||
21 | ACTIVITY OF THE PERSON | 50 | ACTIVITY OF THE PERSON | 234 | 239 | ||
51 | ACHIEVEMENT OF THE OBJECTIVE | 240 | 246 | ||||
52 | THE CORRECTNESS OF THE ACTIVITY | 247 | 250 | ||||
10 | SOCIETY | 22 | SOCIETY | 53 | SOCAL SPHERE | 251 | 257 |
54 | COMMUNICATION | 258 | 265 | ||||
55 | ANTAGONISM | 266 | 270 | ||||
23 | ETHICS | 56 | HONESTY | 271 | 275 | ||
57 | VIRTUE | 276 | 281 | ||||
24 | STATE | 58 | STATE | 282 | 286 | ||
59 | juridicial relationship | 287 | 291 | ||||
11 | CULTURE | 25 | CULTURE | 60 | NATURAL LANGUAGE | 292 | 297 |
61 | CULTURE | 298 | 303 | ||||
62 | ARTS | 304 | 307 | ||||
26 | ECONOMICS | 63 | PRODUCTION | 308 | 311 | ||
64 | PROPERTY | 312 | 316 | ||||
12 | CIVILIZATION | 27 | WAY OF LIFE | 65 | WAY OF LIFE | 317 | 324 |
66 | ALIMENTATION | 325 | 328 | ||||
28 | TECHNICS | 67 | TECHNICS | 329 | 337 | ||
68 | TRANSPORT | 336 | 339 | ||||
29 | TECHNOLOGY | 69 | MATERIALS AND ENERGY | 340 | 343 | ||
70 | TECHNOLOGY | 344 | 347 |